Whom Will I Send?
A VISION FOR SERVING ASIA’S URBAN
POOR
Reference: Grigg, V.
(2004). Companion to the
Poor. GA, USA:
Authentic Media in partnership with World Vision.
Verses
from Ecclesiastes came to
mind one evening when I was back in New Zealand.
There was a little city with a few
men in it;
and a great king came against it
and besieged it,
building great siege works against
it.
But there was found in it a poor,
wise man,
and he by his wisdom delivered the
city.
Yet no one remembered that poor
man.
But I say that wisdom is better
than might,
though the poor man’s wisdom is
despised,
and his words are not heeded
(Ecclesiastes 9:13–16).
Battered by reverse culture shock,
by illness, and by the rejection of friends, I was wandering down a bush track
in the evening light. As I prayed, God brought a picture to my mind; a brilliant
picture, in a manner I’ve come to recognize as from God.
He showed me a hundred “poor,
wise” men and women wandering the byways of the slums, dwelling among the poor
of ten great cities in Asia—men and women who would, as Wesley says, “fear
nothing but God and hate nothing but sin.”
A few days later, an artist living
up the road dropped me a note with a message the Lord had given her. It spoke of
the same call to establish a new movement.
For months, I delayed, praying,
“Lord, I have no contacts with the influential men of the church. Why call me to
establish a movement? Physically, I feel sick! Emotionally, I am in shock!
Socially, I have lost my friends!”
But the Lord continued to
encourage me. I decided not to visit the influential people, but to start where
I was, take what I had, and do what I could. I visited some friends. As I began
to speak of the need in the slums, the Spirit of God was evident in unusual
ways.
Wherever I went, I found
renewal—renewal that would break out when proud Christian leaders had humbled
themselves before God. People would take me to meet these leaders. Most would
listen humbly to this unknown missionary, and then confirm that indeed this was
God’s voice and that he would rise up this work.
God had already spoken to many
others about the poor of Asia’s cities. He had prepared the way, and a new
missionary movement began.
Wanted: rugged laborers
My message to these churches was
simple. God’s method is people!
Do we not hear a call to go as
servants of that rugged cross, laborers whose delight is work, sacrifice and
suffering, whose souls are filled with compassion, and whose lifestyle is that
of simple poverty?
In the next few years, there needs
to be an ever-growing stream, a new thrust to these dirt-and-plywood jungles. We
need bands of people who, on fire with the message of Christ’s kingdom, will
choose a lifestyle of simplicity to proclaim that kingdom to the
poorest of the poor.
These bands can include people at
different life stages or of different marital status, but primarily include men
and women who deliberately choose singleness for a period, couples without
children, or couples whose children have grown up. Together they will form
“cells” or “communities” of six to ten workers to go to each of these great
cities.
These teams need to be trained in
the sending country. When they arrive in the host city, they will begin a full
year of language study and continued orientation. During this time, these teams
will be split up, going two-by-two to different squatter areas. One day a week,
they will gather together for relaxation, mutual ministry, further training and
celebration of the Lord’s Supper at a retreat center, led by an older mature
couple with pastoral and administrative oversight for the “community.”
We need men and women willing to
commit themselves to this task initially for six years—this being long enough to
establish a first church—but with the intention of spending fifteen to
twenty years in the urban community to establish a discipling movement.
It is not unreasonable for a young
person to trust that God will bring fruit during these fifteen to twenty
years. Is it a big enough request to ask God for 1500 new Christians—or 3,000
or 15,000? A harvest like that would be a worthy lifetime’s work. Many have seen
God do this elsewhere.
In 1898, Hudson Taylor, with the
vast needs of inland China in mind, issued a call for “twenty able, earnest and
healthy young men willing to consecrate five years of their lives to
itinerant work, without thought of marriage or of settling down till their
special work is accomplished.” We need a similar breed of Christians for today’s
“new” mission field in the Asian mega-cities.
Younger couples may need to delay
having children until they have had time to establish themselves in these slum
communities, know how to cope with poverty, drunkenness, the food, the climate,
hatred, and learn how to raise children in such an environment.
On each team, the gifts needed are
infinite: a comic designer, an apostle-evangelist, or an apostle-pastor team
leader, an administrator, or a poet-communicator, a specialist in establishing
small-scale industries, etc. But above all, men and women with a drive, zeal,
and the training in the practice of establishing the Kingdom of God are needed.
People who can preach and disciple, consolidate small Bible studies and
transform multitudes of believers into movements of disciples. Men and women
with eternity in their hearts, the promises of God in their souls, and the fire
of holiness in their spirits. Men and women of a rugged cross.
The apostle Peter was such a man.
He walked in a poor man’s wooden sandals (Acts 12:8) and had no gold for the
beggar at the Temple (Acts 3:6).
Similarly, the apostle Paul
underwent stoning, beatings and shipwrecks, living “as poor, yet making many
rich” in his desire to reach the cities of his world.
Stories are told of Toribio, who
traveled barefoot through Mexico. Other Mexicans called him “the poor one”
because he was evidently poorer than they were. He learned the Aztec language
quickly and preached fluently in that language. The Indians loved him like a
father and regarded him almost like a divine Inca because of his total
commitment and absolute poverty. He covered 40,000 miles on foot. He had
nothing of his own to leave behind when he died.
Above all, we need to remember the
Master, who calls us to walk in his sandaled footsteps. He chose poverty in
birth, poverty in life and finally, blood dripping from thorn-crowned brow,
chose poverty on the cross of a criminal.
Who will go? Who will take up the
cross and follow him?
Who will give fifteen or twenty
years for the poorest of the people in the slums of Asia? Who will live among
them, love them, and show them the King? Is this such an unreasonable request
from the Lord who gave his all?
Renewal
As I visited churches calling for
these “rugged laborers,” God was going before me, bringing renewal.
There seemed to be four phases of
renewal. The first was a phase of brokenness, humbling, repentance, restitution
and seeking the Lord. In this phase, God broke into people’s lives in a new way
with power, resulting in worship, evangelism, and the exercise of spiritual
gifts.
The second phase was a
restructuring of traditional church life. House groups developed. Deep
relationships and spiritual ministry to inner personal need occurred.
Evangelism, flowing through normal social relationships, multiplied new
believers. Where there was strong leadership training and disciplined intake of
the word of God, economic changes and care for the poor became part of a new
pattern of life.
Four or five years after renewal
of an older church or the birth of a new fellowship, a third phase emerged.
Scores of people developed an eagerness to be involved in missions. Hundreds
upon hundreds volunteered for the field.
My role was to walk
behind the movement, sensing what God was doing, and providing a structure
to facilitate these missions thrust. We formed a new mission structure
called “Urban Leadership Foundation” to accommodate the people who wanted to
serve Asia’s urban poor
No unemployment
The vision I had seen called for a
hundred laborers. A hundred laborers means a hundred church-planters—people who
can pioneer new fellowships in unreached areas. Such a task requires all the
social, intellectual, and spiritual capacities a person has. No lifestyle can
match the thrill of church-planting. None demands so much from a person.
Renewal alone will not produce
such men and women. It takes eight or nine years of mature training in a dynamic
church situation to produce a leader ready to serve in Asia. If we would develop
long-term cross-cultural missionaries, the critical element is an
apprenticeship relationship.
Elisha, apprentice to Elijah,
received a double portion of Elijah’s spirit. Joshua, forty years’ servant of
Moses, led the people into Israel. Paul could say of Timothy: “I have no one
else like him, who is genuinely interested in your welfare.”
In the past, training has been a
unique contribution of a number of para-church organizations in the body of
Christ. Churches need encouragement to develop this apprenticeship model of
training laborers.
As God called more men and women
to work among the poor, I would sit down with the pastor and elders of a church
and discuss with them principles and phases of training potential laborers.
Pastors were excited to see a new pattern of ministry opening up before them.
Theologically, they had moved to a commitment to training. They appreciated
practical input that helped them implement this new theology.
In response, I adapted a “Focus
Chart” that had been developed by Gene Tabor. My version came to be known as
“The Four Seasons of Christian Training.” Rather than giving an entire program
of training as most groups do, this model gives training principles to use
during the four commonly identifiable stages of growth of a potential worker.
Pastors and elders would spend considerable time enthusiastically discussing
what stages they were in and what the next steps of growth should be.
The first phase is a healthy
Christian “babyhood” in a warm, relational, celebrating home-group and church
fellowship. Most growing churches had become skilled in providing this.
The second phase requires more
personal discipling of the person by an elder or house group leader in the
context of ministering to a small group of other believers.
The third phase is the involvement
of disciples in ministry to others as part of the church’s ministry team—as
house-group leaders, youth leaders, part of the counseling or outreach team, and
so on. Even the leader of a nursery can use this role to disciple young mothers.
During this phase of ministry, the
critical element is development of character. Potential leaders need to meet at
least fortnightly to minister to one another at the personal level, relating
scriptural teaching to the problems or matters that have emerged during the
past fortnight.
The fourth phase of training
focuses on developing gifts and calling. It can involve a semi-independent
ministry: establishing a church or pioneering a new ministry thrust.
Robin and his merry men
There is another kind of laborer
in the Scriptures—men and women skilled as deacons and deaconesses. We not only
need the apostle, the pastor-teacher, and the evangelist; we need men and women
filled with the Holy Spirit and with wisdom—men and women skilled in using money
given by the rich to meet the needs of the poor. (The early deacons’ biggest
responsibility was not giving out hymnals at the door!)
We need people skilled in establishing small-scale
industries: carpentry shops, electronic shops, and machine shops. We need men
and women skilled in social work, administration, and community development.
Couples in their forties and fifties whose children are now independent are the
best possible people for such tasks.
Wisdom
In Ecclesiastes, the poor man who
saved the city was wise. The wisdom needed to minister in the
slums is not primarily learned in school. Christ imparted his wisdom in
the context of loving action. His type of wisdom has to do with character,
decision-making, ethical issues, and relationships.
Yet godly wisdom is not only
acquired “on the street.” As Solomon adds, wisdom is based on “getting
knowledge, getting understanding.” It has an intellectual component.
The urban mission field needs men
and women of the finest academic training. The cultural understanding needed to
mobilize a movement comes from the finest training in language learning,
cross-cultural missions’ theory, and church history. Community development and
church growth principles must be mastered if the kingdom will be established in
a community. The complexity of issues is unending.
We must upgrade our schools to provide the best
postgraduate evangelical training in such areas. If we find an un-biblical
anti-intellectualism inherent in our churches (despite our penchant for academic
degrees and titles), we must renounce it.
God’s wisdom comes from the Spirit
revealing the mind of Christ. Finely trained minds are the outworking of the
gift of spiritual discernment. Workers need to have discernment concerning the
leading of the Spirit. They need to know how to use spiritual gifts in
confrontations with the demonic, in healing the sick, in prophecy, through a
(supernatural) word of discernment, through a word of knowledge, or through
the interpretation of dreams.
The missionary needs to be a
person of balance—sound in theology, bold and authoritative, but meek and
flexible; able to exercise spiritual gifts and power, but not extremist; fully
developing his academic capacities, but deeply spiritual and pragmatic.
Urban workers need to be able to
grapple with the concepts of the Scriptures. They will not teach using books
and concepts, but like their Master, using story and parable. The ability to
tell stories grows out of a full life, marked by a fine sensitivity—an ability
to feel what others around you are feeling. The urban missionary must be a
leader in the midst of the people, able to incarnate a people’s soul, speak
their poetry, and understand their aspirations.
This is the gift of cross-cultural
communication. It requires strength of will on the inside, an inner fiber
coupled with above-average sensitivity, flexibility, and adaptability. It
involves a capacity for suspended judgment—being able to hold two opposing
views in one’s mind without feeling buried by tension. The black-and-white
absolutist or judgmental thinker is not a natural missionary.
Above all, urban missionaries need
to be men and women of the word of God. A layperson can do an in-depth study of
all the scriptures over five or six years, and memorize several hundred
passages that will transform thought patterns. The main goal of studying the
Bible is to know, love, and understand Jesus. The values and actions he talks
about in the Sermon on the Mount will best prepare us to cross cultures. Perhaps
memorizing that sermon is the place to begin.
Missionary school
Along with theological and
vocational education, training for such a man or woman is along the lines of the
training Jesus gave the disciples—spending time with alcoholics, rescuing
lesbians and homosexuals, walking for months with the drug addict, explaining
the gospel to abusive students, living among the poorest immigrant community,
healing prejudice, and visiting prisoners. The more difficult the sufferings
encountered in our comfortable Western society, the better equipped the
missionary will be.
Missionaries to the poor should
study the lives of those who have walked before them: Hudson Taylor, Xavier,
Assisi or Mother Teresa, Amy Carmichael, Sadhu Sundar Singh, and so on. They
should grapple with the social implications of the gospel in their own country
to have a basis for grappling with it elsewhere, picking up social work and
community development skills where possible.
Learning to work under authority
is important. Only those with the power of submission, those able to trust
others with decisions about their lives will survive the tensions of a mission
community. Such lessons must be learned before reaching the field.
Potential missionaries should be
taught to live without possessions (except books, since these contribute to
wisdom and tools of the trade). They should learn to eat little meat and few
desserts, to know how to keep their bodies healthy through wise diet, natural
foods, the use of herbs and good exercise. They should practice living in
crowded conditions and coping with constant pressures.
The urban missionary must be able
to integrate a life that relates both to the poor as well as to the rich. In
this way, the missionary to the slums will find life less comfortable than the
missionary to a remote village. Village missionaries can reassume their Western
roles when they visit the city. But slum missionaries must continually balance
an incarnational lifestyle against the need to build relationships with mentors
and officials in universities and government agencies. They must wear several
hats at the same time.
Francis Xavier was insistent on
tested men for the mission field. He suggested the following tests for
potential missionaries:
The spiritual exercises will be
made for a month, in order to judge the nature of the individual, his
steadfastness, temperament, inclinations and vocation. For another month, he
will serve the poor in the hospitals in every kind of menial work he might be
ordered to perform, because to humble oneself in all meekness and care nothing
for the esteem of the world is to set at naught human respect. During the third
month, he must make a pilgrimage on foot and without money, placing his entire
hope in the Creator and Lord, accustoming himself to bad food and a comfortless
bed. He who cannot either rest or travel without food and with poor sleep for
twenty-four hours will be unable, we believe, to persevere in the Society.1
It was not enough to Xavier that
we have spiritual yearnings and romantic dreams. We need to pass tough tests
before qualifying as workers among the poor. The harvest is urgent, but God
takes time to train his harvesters.
Sacrifice
The call is costly in terms of
family relationships, separation from children and health. “How lonesome the
weary hours confined to my room,” wrote Hudson Taylor upon the death of his
wife. “How I missed my dear wife and the little pattering footsteps of the
children far away in England.” While God never calls us to desert our family
responsibilities, he may, for a limited season, call us to sever those links.
Most great mission leaders, while
knowing God’s power in prayer for the sick, were often sickly themselves, living
in difficult climates, in situations of poorly controlled hygiene.
All extension of the kingdom is
accomplished at cost. Yet the Lord is not our debtor. Our children, our wives,
our husbands, our bodies are his. He holds them in his hands and can do as he
wills with them.
Kagawa wrote this poem to his
wife:
You who dwell
in the heart of my heart
Listen to me;
This you must know—
I am a child of grief and pain
Bending my fingers to count my
woe.
You yield me everything;
But I have nothing
I can bring
To give to you.
Know
You have married
Poverty, sorrow;
Bear it with me;
The storm will be over
Tomorrow.
A little while
For us
The rod;
And then,
Then God.2
His wife Haru had not only married
a man who would always be wandering—she had married a life of poverty and
sorrow.
For many, work in the slums is a
call to celibacy; for others, a life of singleness for some years. This call to
singleness is not a call to individualism, but to involvement in a community.
Singleness in the ancient orders involved vows of chastity. A commitment to
chastity, or purity of heart, is contrary to all the tendencies of nature. But
chosen singleness is not a breaking of human affections. It is given that we
might love our neighbor more fully. Singleness is a calling in God’s economy,
enabling people to more deeply know their Lord. Many people give their early
years to the pursuit of love—we must give it to the pursuit of God.
A poor man
In Ecclesiastes, the wise man who
saved cities was also poor. The missionary of today is one who can support
himself and others using income earned through a trade or profession. Our
choice of poverty is not a choice of dependency. Our poverty is chosen as a
sign of love and justice. It is not to be a burden, but to bring joy! It will
set free for it is freely chosen. “Laboring poverty” cannot be legislated by the
rules of a mission. It is chosen freely by those who, having forsaken wealth,
cannot be bought by money; having forsaken power, cannot be bought position and
influence; having forsaken all security, cannot be bought by the offer of
security.
Such a lifestyle and level of
commitment is hard to maintain. Enthusiasm of the early days passes away; easier
courses appear; the capacity to suffer often decreases as one suffers. Idealism
easily dims, and in doing so, it may either bring balance or turn one back from
earlier single-mindedness. And the constant glitter of the cities in which we
dwell subtly brings captivity to the desire for things.
The Apostle Peter struggled, too.
He once told Jesus, “Lord, we have left everything to follow you.” What he
really was asking was, “What do we get out of it?”
Jesus did not rebuke him. His
reply was:
There is no one who has left house
or brothers and sisters or mother or father or children or lands for my sake and
for the gospel, who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and
brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions and,
in the age to come, eternal life (Mark 10:28–30).
The movement
Behind such a mission thrust of
poor, wise men and women, we need a movement of hundreds of men and women in the
sending base. These “senders” choose another sort of poverty—that of
simplicity.
This is the commitment of my home
church. They send and support almost thirty missionaries. The means of
supporting these laborers? Simplicity!
One church leader has chosen to
limit his engineering business to supply only his basic needs and devote himself
to the business of the kingdom. Some have chosen homes half as expensive as they
formerly owned. Others sit down and calculate every area of expense to see if
they can spend less. They count each item in their possession, sell the excess
items counted, and give to the poor. Many have given their best clothes to the
poor. Some have sold their jewelry. One couple, in response to the Lord’s
prompting, gave a welding machine for the poor in the slums.
These are ordinary men and women,
“living simply that others may simply live,” living frugally that missionaries
may continue spreading the kingdom, living without to win the fight against the
demon of materialism that controls our nations. They live out their simplicity
communally with other believers to battle the twin brother of materialism—
excessive individualism. It has destroyed not only our society, but also our
nuclear family structures. It is the cause of the new poverty of the urban West.
How can we live communally? In New
Zealand, the most effective communal structure has been the house group, a
weekly meeting of six to fifteen people learning to mold their lives together as
“family,” seeking to hear God’s direction, worshipping, and studying the word
together. Members struggle together with the social and economic implications
of the kingdom. Sharing money, recreation, garden tools, meals, vehicles, and
ministry all have emerged as natural outcomes.
Some have added semi-detached
quarters to their home for a solo mother, widow, or single young folk. Others
have obtained three or four houses close to each other in the same street to
share the load of hospitality, child supervision, and possessions.
Along with such communities of
committed believers, God longs to raise up a band of praying people who will
give their lives to prayer for the slums. An older woman of 84 has prayed daily
for me these 13 years. A young woman has chosen to work half time and give her
life to prayer. A band of women in my church are known as women of
intercession. This is the pattern of history. Nunneries have been the source of
power for numerous movements. Assisi and his men, in times of confusion and
uncertainty, would repair to Saint Clara and her sisters and ask these
cloistered women to seek the Lord’s will on their behalf.
Servants of the Lord
Seventy of us were gathered in
prayer, worshipping God. Seven had just been commissioned to Asia’s slums.
Others had committed themselves to training in preparation to go.
As we sang together, a picture of
the Lord came to mind.
He came from Mount Zion on a
magnificent white charger, descending upon one of the great cities of Asia.
Millions of city-dwellers lined its streets, all worshipping God in song and
dance. There seemed to be no rich, no poor. Each one had a home. But all had
left their work and homes to worship the King.
By the city gates, in the middle
of the crowd, was a wizened, simply garbed man leaning on his staff—not
noticeably different from the crowd. But as the King swept through the gates,
he paused, looked across the crowd, and greeted the servant with a smile, a nod
and a simple “well done.”
The King continued on his way as
the millions delighted with him. And the companion to the poor was content with
his labor.
NOTES
1.
Xavier Leon Du Jour, S.J., St. Francis Xavier, pp.65,66 — trans.
Henry Pascual Oiz, S.J., St. Paul Press Training School, Bandra, Bombay, 1950.
2.
Toyohiko Kagawa, “The Cross of the Whole Christ,” in Meditations on
the Cross. SCM, 1936.
| |
|